Rédaction Africa Links 24 with Zimeye
Published on 2024-03-08 08:49:34
Qoki Zindlovukazi, a business owner with USD25 million in cash, made a dramatic appearance before the Manchester Crown Court in a coffin enclosure, claiming that her life was in danger from angry Zimbabweans. Sithule Tshuma, the cash owner, addressed Justice Isles from inside the coffin, alleging threats from a large crowd while the courtroom only had three people present: the complainant Sibo, journalist Simba Chikanza, and Sibo’s brother. Despite the unusual circumstances, Tshuma lost the first round of her case.
Tshuma insisted on being housed in a coffin during the court proceedings, allowing only the judge to see her body. The court had to accommodate her request by building a special enclosure for her. She is accused of making the substantial sum of USD25 million from selling land that she did not rightfully own. Despite the dramatic display and allegations, there was minimal public interest in the case, with Tshuma being the sole focus of attention.
During the session, Tshuma attempted to have Simba Chikanza removed as a McKenzie friend for the complainant on the grounds that he was a journalist who had reported false information. However, the judge dismissed her request, emphasizing the importance of public interest in the case. Tshuma also failed to provide a complete witness statement, citing being overwhelmed as the reason for the omission.
The judge ordered Tshuma to cover the complainant’s costs, including hotel and transportation expenses. Tshuma claimed to have evidence from the Zimbabwean government supporting her land sale to Sibo, but the judge requested all relevant documents to be presented promptly. The judge stressed the impact of the ruling on public interest, indicating that more individuals could potentially be affected by the case outcome.
As the court proceedings unfolded, it became evident that the case would need more time for preparation. The judge postponed the hearing to allow Tshuma to submit her statement and make the necessary payments to the complainant by a specified deadline. The case was adjourned to a later date in April 2024 to give Tshuma ample time to prepare adequately.
Despite the sensational nature of the proceedings, Tshuma’s case ultimately revolved around the validity of her title deeds and the legitimacy of her business operations. The judge reiterated the significance of public interest and the potential ramifications of the ruling on multiple parties involved. The outcome of the case could have far-reaching consequences beyond the immediate parties present in the courtroom.
In conclusion, the courtroom drama surrounding Qoki Zindlovukazi and Sithule Tshuma’s case highlighted the complex legal implications and public interest at stake. The unique circumstances of Tshuma’s coffin enclosure and the allegations of threats added a layer of intrigue to the proceedings. The case’s adjournment underscored the need for thorough preparation and the importance of upholding legal standards in the face of controversy.
Read the original article on The Zimbabwe Eye
