Rédaction Africa Links 24 with Tim Cohen
Published on 2024-02-22 20:09:36
During the early 1980s, the British satirical comedy series “Yes, Minister” provided audiences with a humorous look at the inner workings of government bureaucracy. Set in the office of a fictional minister at the Department of Administrative Affairs in Whitehall, the show featured the interactions between the minister, Jim Hacker, and his Permanent Secretary, Sir Humphrey Appleby. The dynamic between the two characters showcased the struggles between political appointees and career civil servants, with Sir Humphrey often subtly undermining Minister Hacker’s decisions.
The series highlighted the contrast between the ideals of an apolitical civil service and the reality of political influence on government appointments. While bureaucrats are meant to implement government policy regardless of their own political beliefs, in practice, politicians often surround themselves with like-minded individuals who can advance their agendas. This tension between professionalism and political loyalty is a common theme in governments around the world.
In different countries, the rules and traditions surrounding civil service appointments vary. In the United States, department heads are often political appointees, while in European countries like France and Germany, senior civil servants are typically selected from within the civil service ranks. Communist countries, on the other hand, tightly control all civil service appointments to ensure party loyalty.
The African National Congress (ANC) in South Africa has faced criticism for its practice of cadre deployment, which prioritizes party loyalty over professional qualifications in government appointments. The ANC defends cadre deployment as a normal practice in democratic systems, citing similar practices by opposition parties like the Democratic Alliance (DA). However, recent revelations have shed light on the flaws in the ANC’s cadre deployment system, including chaotic decision-making processes and instances of political interference in appointments.
The power struggles within the ANC over appointments to key positions, including the judiciary and state-owned enterprises, have raised concerns about the party’s commitment to upholding professional ethics and competency in government roles. The lack of transparency and accountability in the cadre deployment process has led to instances of mismanagement and incompetence, negatively impacting service delivery and public trust in the government.
Despite criticism from the Zondo Commission and the public, the ANC has defended its cadre deployment practices, arguing that loyalty to the party is an important factor in making appointments. However, the continued failure to demonstrate a balance between loyalty and merit in appointments has raised doubts about the effectiveness of cadre deployment in ensuring good governance and efficient service delivery.
In conclusion, the debate over cadre deployment in South Africa highlights the challenges of balancing political loyalty and professional competency in government appointments. While loyalty to the party is important, the erosion of professionalism and competence can have serious consequences for governance and public service delivery. Finding a balance between political considerations and merit-based appointments is crucial to ensuring effective and ethical governance in a democratic society.
Read the original article on Daily Maverick
