Rédaction Africa Links 24 with Stephen Grootes
Published on 2024-02-28 22:39:19
Jacob Zuma, a prominent member of the uMkhonto Wesizwe (MK) party, has recently made controversial statements regarding teenage pregnancies and gay marriage. Additionally, the party’s spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, has confirmed his familial connection to former SARS commissioner Tom Moyane and addressed questions about a contract won by a company controlled by him that was later voided.
In 2016, it was revealed that a company owned by Ndhlela had secured a lucrative tax collection contract from SARS, with potential profits amounting to R220 million. Ndhlela defended his actions, stating that he had disclosed his relationship with Moyane on his CV but denied any wrongdoing in the bidding process. When it came to light that Moyane was unaware of his nephew’s involvement, the contract was ultimately nullified.
The Nugent Commission later uncovered that Moyane, along with the consultancy Bain, had intentionally weakened SARS for personal gain. This revelation pointed to a close relationship between Moyane and Zuma, with the weakening of SARS allegedly benefiting Zuma. It was suggested that this alliance had influenced the decision-making within SARS.
Ndhlela has claimed that the establishment of the MK party was the result of four years of meticulous planning and organization. He emphasized that the party was gaining significant support from individuals seeking change, particularly those who felt disenfranchised by the existing political landscape.
Zuma’s recent comments on teenage pregnancies and gay marriage have stirred controversy. While he advocated for sending pregnant teenagers to Robben Island for education, Ndhlela clarified that this was not official MK policy but rather a personal statement made by Zuma. Similarly, Zuma’s views on gay marriage were met with criticism, with Ndhlela emphasizing that the party did not intend to ban such marriages.
The overshadowing presence of Zuma within the MK party poses a significant challenge. Despite not being the legal founder of the party, Zuma’s influence and image dominate the public perception of MK. This dependence on Zuma has led to concerns that the party’s agenda may be driven primarily by his personal interests rather than a coherent political vision.
In conclusion, the controversies surrounding MK, particularly those involving Zuma and Ndhlela, highlight the complexities and challenges facing the party. As it navigates through political turmoil and public scrutiny, it must strive to establish its own identity and purpose separate from the shadow of its prominent members. Only by doing so can MK truly fulfill its potential and make a meaningful impact in the political landscape.
Read the original article on Daily Maverick
