Rédaction Africa Links 24 with Pierre de Vos
Published on 2024-03-07 21:36:07
In a recent article in the London Review of Books, Pankaj Mishra highlights the Israeli “liquidation of Gaza,” a brutal assault that has drawn attention from individuals like Blinne Nà Ghrálaigh, an Irish lawyer representing South Africa at the International Court of Justice in The Hague. The victims of this onslaught are pleading for help in real-time, hoping for international intervention. Despite such atrocities, no academic boycott has been imposed on Israeli universities or those closely linked to the Israeli military, where soldiers often post videos of themselves committing war crimes in Gaza.
The reluctance to take action may stem from concerns about academic freedom guaranteed by the South African Constitution. While protecting academic freedom is crucial, some fear financial repercussions for opposing the Israeli aggression. However, given the severity of the situation in Gaza, standing up against such crimes becomes a moral imperative.
Mishra argues that Gaza has become a litmus test for political and ethical consciousness in the 21st century. The hypocrisy of global political elites and their support for Israel’s actions has fueled outrage among many who hope that a strong response could pressure governments to uphold humanitarian values. The principles of respecting freedom, tolerance, solidarity, and moral responsibility are at stake in the face of such atrocities.
The right to academic freedom is essential but must be balanced with accountability for institutions complicit in genocide. Academic boycotts, when justified, can serve as a tool to hold such institutions accountable. The decision to sever ties with Israeli institutions involved in the Gaza crisis should not be seen as a violation of academic freedom but as a stance against complicity in crimes against humanity.
While restrictions on individual academics may raise concerns, prohibiting collaboration with institutions complicit in genocide is a justified measure. Safeguarding academic freedom does not mean turning a blind eye to atrocities committed by academic partners. South African universities can fulfill their duty under international conventions by taking a principled stand against such actions.
In conclusion, the decision to support an academic boycott of Israeli institutions involved in genocide is a necessary step to uphold moral values and prevent further atrocities. While concerns about academic freedom are valid, the greater imperative of preventing genocide takes precedence. By sending a clear message to Israeli elites, South African universities can demonstrate a commitment to justice and human rights.
Read the original article on Daily Maverick
