Rédaction Africa Links 24 with Peter Fabricius
Published on 2024-03-20 22:19:49
The “U.S.- South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act” is making its way through the legislative process, with expectations for a formal roll call vote in the committee before moving to the full House of Representatives. This bill, introduced by Republican John James and Democrat Jared Moscowitz in February, aims to hold South Africa accountable for its foreign policy decisions that may impact U.S. national security interests.
The bill specifically calls out the ANC government for aligning with “malign actors” such as Russia, China, and Hamas, which is designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the US. It criticizes South Africa for building military and political ties with these entities, contrary to its stated non-aligned position. An amendment added by James also condemned International Relations Minister Naledi Pandor for supporting pro-Palestinian demonstrations outside embassies of countries that back Israel.
While some Republicans, like Scott Perry, advocated for cutting off foreign aid to South Africa due to its foreign policy alignment, others like James argued against it, emphasizing the importance of aid, particularly in the health sector. Anthony Carroll, a retired professor, highlighted the impact of cutting aid, particularly on programs like Pepfar that have been crucial in fighting HIV/AIDS in South Africa.
On the other side, Democrats like Gregory Meeks expressed concern over the bill hindering cooperation with South Africa, a vital economic partner on the continent. Despite disagreements on South Africa’s foreign policy, the US administration sought to maintain a working relationship with the country. Some Democrats saw the James bill as duplicative, considering existing legislation calling for a review of South Africa’s participation in Agoa.
While the bill made progress in the House of Representatives, the Senate has yet to produce similar legislation, casting doubts on its future. Meanwhile, South African Minister Pandor has been engaging with various stakeholders in the US to mend strained relations following controversies around South Africa’s positions on international conflicts.
During her interactions in the US, Pandor faced criticism for downplaying authoritarian practices in certain countries like Iran. This incident raised concerns about South Africa’s stance on global issues and its understanding of authoritarian regimes.
In conclusion, the “U.S.- South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act” reflects the ongoing complexities in the relationship between the two countries. While efforts are being made to address concerns around South Africa’s foreign policy decisions, challenges remain in balancing cooperation and accountability. The bill’s journey through the legislative process underscores the intricate dynamics at play in international relations and the need for continued dialogue and engagement to strengthen bilateral ties.
Read the original article on Daily Maverick
