Rédaction Africa Links 24 with SudanTribune
Published on 2024-03-22 22:19:11
The outbreak of conflict in Sudan in April 2023 led to a proposal to establish an emergency government to address the urgent needs of citizens and resume regular government functions that had been disrupted. Public services including security, health, education, and banking services were severely affected during the conflict. The idea of forming an emergency government gained traction a month after the outbreak of war, with calls from various sectors of society for the establishment of a transitional government.
In the absence of a competent executive power, political considerations focused on finding suitable constitutional mechanisms to establish an executive power that could temporarily assume the responsibilities until normal governance could be restored. Several civil initiatives advocated for the establishment of a time-bound transitional government with limited competencies during the war phase. The consensus among these initiatives highlighted the need for urgent action to address the power vacuum in the country.
A critical concern when forming a transitional government during wartime is the constitutional basis for such a government. Various models for transitional governments were explored, including emergency government, national consensus government, caretaker government, government in exile, shadow government, and a government formed under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. Each of these models has its unique characteristics and legal frameworks based on the specific circumstances of the country.
The legal and political framework for forming a transitional government in Sudan was analyzed, considering constitutional determinants, security considerations, and the role of exceptional circumstances. It was noted that Sudan’s constitution lacked explicit provisions for forming a caretaker government or a government in exile. The formation of a national consensus government was seen as viable under certain political conditions.
The study also examined the effectiveness of shadow governments, particularly in monitoring the performance of the incumbent government, and the possibility of establishing a government under a UNSC resolution similar to the Kosovo government model. These models were evaluated in the context of Sudan’s political and security situation.
In conclusion, the report highlighted the importance of political consensus and international support in forming a transitional government in Sudan. It emphasized the need for broad engagement with civil society groups and political parties to ensure the success and legitimacy of the transitional government. The recommendations included the signing of a comprehensive peace agreement to provide a legislative framework for the transitional government and the establishment of monitoring mechanisms to ensure compliance with ceasefire provisions. Overall, the study provided valuable insights into the various options for forming a transitional government in Sudan during times of political crisis.
Read the original article on Sudan Tribune
