Rédaction Africa Links 24 with Gaël Rangain
Published on 2024-03-27 10:00:13
The admissibility of questions rests with the Speaker” (Sooroojdev Phokeer reminds MPs Juman, Boolell, and Aumeer, protesting against the rejection of their interpellations) “The question is very specific. Can we have a reply specifically? Is that too much to ask after three and a half months of vacation? (The leader of […])
In a recent parliamentary session, tensions arose when MPs Sooroojdev Phokeer, Juman, Boolell, and Aumeer questioned the admissibility of their inquiries being rejected by the Speaker. Phokeer, speaking on behalf of his fellow MPs, expressed frustration at what he perceived to be a lack of transparency and accountability in the parliamentary process.
Phokeer reminded the Speaker that the admissibility of questions ultimately rests with them and questioned why their specific inquiries were being dismissed without proper consideration. He emphasized the importance of receiving a clear and direct response to their queries, particularly after a prolonged period of parliamentary recess.
The MPs’ concerns centered around the need for accountability and responsiveness from government officials, especially in light of the ongoing challenges facing the country. They argued that as elected representatives, it was their duty to hold the government accountable and seek answers to pertinent issues that affect the well-being of their constituents.
The rejection of their interpellations was seen as a hindrance to their ability to fulfill their roles as lawmakers and represent the interests of the people who elected them. Phokeer urged the Speaker to reconsider their decision and allow for a fair and impartial evaluation of their questions.
The Speaker, in response, defended their decision by stating that the admissibility of questions is determined based on established parliamentary guidelines and procedures. They reiterated that their role is to ensure that parliamentary proceedings adhere to the rules and regulations set forth in the parliamentary handbook.
Despite the Speaker’s explanation, the MPs remained dissatisfied with the outcome and continued to press for a reconsideration of their inquiries. They argued that the rejection of their questions deprived them of the opportunity to address pressing issues and seek accountability from government officials.
The standoff between the MPs and the Speaker underscored the challenges and tensions that can arise in parliamentary proceedings. It highlighted the importance of maintaining transparency, accountability, and fairness in the legislative process to ensure effective governance and representation of the people’s interests.
In conclusion, the admissibility of questions in parliament rests with the Speaker, but it is crucial for elected representatives to continue advocating for accountability and responsiveness from government officials to serve the best interests of the public. The ongoing dialogue between MPs and the Speaker serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding democratic principles and ensuring that all voices are heard in the decision-making process.
Read the original article(French) on Le Mauricien
