Rédaction Africa Links 24 with Kenyans.co.ke
Published on 2024-03-30 16:54:43
The recent announcement made by Shanzu Senior Principal Magistrate Joe Omido has stirred up significant debates and confusion surrounding the ban on shisha, leaving both shisha enthusiasts and businesses unsure about the enforcement of the ban. Magistrate Omido’s ruling, which resulted in the discharge of all 48 individuals who were charged with selling and smoking shisha, has brought into question the legality of the ban itself.
According to Magistrate Omido, the ban on shisha did not meet the necessary formalization requirements under the Public Health (Control of Shisha Smoking) Rules, 2017, as mandated by the Constitution. This means that any criminal cases or charges based on these regulations have been deemed invalid and cannot be used for prosecution. Furthermore, Omido pointed out significant procedural deficiencies in the charges brought against the accused, stating that they did not align with the requirements outlined in the Criminal Procedure Code. The absence of specific offenses on the charge sheets rendered them legally inadequate, leading to the dismissal of all matters related to shisha offenses.
The ruling has created uncertainty surrounding the operation of clubs and shisha outlets, as the lack of formal regulations prohibiting shisha leaves these establishments in a legal grey area. Without clear guidelines, it is unclear whether these businesses can continue operating without the risk of prosecution. This ambiguity also leaves proprietors and patrons uncertain about the legal status of shisha consumption within such premises.
Additionally, the fate of individuals arrested for shisha-related offenses, particularly those who have been released or are awaiting trial, is now under scrutiny. The dismissal of charges against the 48 individuals raises questions about the status of individuals currently in detention or facing trial for similar offenses. Legal experts anticipate challenges to ongoing prosecutions, emphasizing the need for clarity regarding the legal standing of shisha-related charges.
Furthermore, the ruling has raised concerns about confiscated properties during shisha-related arrests and raids. With charges against individuals deemed invalid, the status of confiscated assets, including shisha paraphernalia and establishments, is uncertain. Stakeholders are seeking clarification on whether confiscated properties will be returned to their owners or if alternative measures will be implemented to address this aspect of enforcement.
Overall, Magistrate Omido’s ruling has not only brought to light fundamental questions about the legality of the shisha ban but has also initiated a broader conversation about public health regulations and their implementation. As stakeholders await further developments, the uncertainty surrounding the future of shisha regulation underscores the necessity for a comprehensive and transparent approach to public health policies.
Read the original article on Kenyans.co.ke
