Rédaction Africa Links 24 with babucarr balajo
Published on 2024-03-19 09:29:44
The ongoing debate surrounding the bill seeking to unban female genital mutilation/cutting has sparked intense discussions and actions in The Gambia. Unlike other debates that tend to die down quickly, this particular issue has shown resilience and continues to capture the attention of the public. Various events such as conferences, marches, demonstrations, and lobbying efforts directed at National Assembly Members have all played a role in keeping the discussion alive.
For over a month now, the topic of whether to revoke the law banning FGM has generated strong opinions from different groups within the country. Those in favor of lifting the ban argue that FGM is a deeply rooted cultural and religious practice that should be preserved. They highlight the long-standing tradition of FGM and question why it should remain prohibited, especially in a predominantly Muslim nation like The Gambia.
On the other hand, women’s groups and numerous organizations advocating for women’s rights have stood firm in their opposition to lifting the ban. They emphasize the harmful effects of FGM on young women and girls, pointing to the psychological and physical trauma it can cause. Additionally, some religious scholars have joined the discourse, asserting that FGM is not a practice supported by Islam but rather a cultural tradition being falsely presented as a religious obligation.
Despite the differing views and strong convictions on both sides of the debate, the principles of democracy allow for open dialogue and the expression of varied perspectives. Ultimately, it is the persuasive arguments and strategic approaches of each camp that will influence the outcome of the debate. In The Gambia, this dynamic is currently unfolding as stakeholders continue to voice their positions on the matter.
Nevertheless, amidst the fervor and passion surrounding the debate, it is essential for all parties involved to exercise restraint in their language and conduct. Personal attacks, insults, and disrespectful behavior have no place in a constructive dialogue that aims to address a critical issue like FGM. As elected representatives, National Assembly Members have a responsibility to carefully consider the interests and well-being of the populace when making decisions on such significant matters.
Ultimately, the decision on whether to retain or lift the ban on FGM lies with the National Assembly Members, who are entrusted with representing the will of the people. If a majority of constituents express a desire for the ban to be maintained, then it is incumbent upon their representatives to vote accordingly. Similarly, if there is overwhelming support for the continuation of FGM practices, those views should also be taken into consideration. This is the essence of democracy, where the will of the majority shapes the laws and policies of the land.
In conclusion, the ongoing debate on FGM in The Gambia reflects the complexity and sensitivity of cultural practices and religious beliefs intersecting with human rights and gender equality. It is a test of the democratic process and the ability of society to engage in respectful dialogue and decision-making on contentious issues. As the debate continues, it is imperative that all stakeholders uphold the values of democracy, tolerance, and respect for diverse opinions to ensure a fair and informed resolution on the matter.
Read the original article on The Standard
